Jump to Navigation

Lancaster PA Probate and Estate Administration Law Blog

The DIrty Dozen for 2013 - Part 2

Last week we gave you the first six scams of the IRS's "Dirty Dozen." This week's column presents the second half of 2013's "Dirty Dozen". Don't fall prey to these schemes.

Including income that was never earned, either as wages or as self-employment income in order to maximize refundable credits, is a popular scam. Claiming income on your tax return that you did not earn or expenses you did not pay in order to secure larger refundable credits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) could result in repaying the erroneous refunds, including interest and penalties and, in some cases, even prosecution.

To many of us it is counter-intuitive to think that if you have more income, you get a bigger refund - but with some refundable credits that is exactly the case. Unlike most deductions and credits, the EITC is refundable -- taxpayers can get it even if they owe no tax.

Because it is refundable, the Earned Income Tax Credit is a magnet for tax fraud. Edwin Rubenstein, president of ESR Research issued a report in 2009 documenting abuse of the EITC. Rubinstein found that, "Year after year about one-third of all EITC returns are based on illegal multiple returns, phony Social Security numbers or claims of nonexistent children or spouses."

The General Accounting Office has reported that the IRS estimates between 27 and 32 percent of EITC dollars are paid erroneously.

8. False Form 1099 Refund Claims

In some cases, individuals have made refund claims based on the bogus theory that the federal government maintains secret accounts for U.S. citizens and that taxpayers can gain access to the accounts by issuing 1099-OID forms to the IRS. In this ongoing scam, the perpetrator files a fake information return, such as a Form 1099 Original Issue Discount (OID), to justify a false refund claim on a corresponding tax return.

7. False/Inflated Income and Expenses

The Dirty Dozen for 2013 - Part 1

dirty dozen 1.jpgOn March 26 the IRS released its annual list of the worst 12 tax scams for the year. The IRS cautions taxpayers not to fall for any of these scams - often these scams are at their peak during the filing season as people prepare their tax returns. This week's column presents one-half of the "Dirty Dozen".

1. Identity Theft and Refund Fraud

Tax fraud through the use of identity theft tops this year's Dirty Dozen list. For the 2013 tax season, the IRS has put in place a number of additional steps to prevent identity theft and detect refund fraud before it occurs. The strategy uses a three-pronged effort focusing on fraud prevention, early detection and victim assistance.

                                                     Not this Dirty Dozen.   

Taxpayers who believe they are at risk of identity theft due to lost or stolen personal information should contact the IRS immediately so the agency can take action to secure their tax account. Taxpayers can call the IRS Identity Protection Specialized Unit at 800-908-4490.

2. Phishing

Phishing is a scam typically carried out with the help of unsolicited email or a fake website. If you receive an unsolicited email that appears to be from either the IRS or an organization closely linked to the IRS, such as the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS), report it by sending it to phishing@irs.gov. The IRS does not initiate contact with taxpayers by email to request personal or financial information.

3. Return Preparer Fraud

About 60 percent of taxpayers will use tax professionals this year to prepare their tax returns. Most return preparers provide honest service to their clients. But some unscrupulous preparers prey on unsuspecting taxpayers, and the result can be refund fraud or identity theft. Taxpayers are legally responsible for what's on their tax return even if it is prepared by someone else.

 

 

 

A Man is Not a Financial Plan

"Remember, Ginger Rogers did everything Fred Astaire did, but backwards and in high heels."  - Faith Whittlesey

According to the United States Bureau of the Census, at some point in their lives, an overwhelming majority of American women - fully 90% - will have to bear responsibility for their own financial security by virtue of widowhood, divorce or choosing to remain single.

A recent Forbes article declares that "estate planning is a women's issue"  The article notes the fact that women live longer than men do, on average, and are also more likely to marry older spouses. As a result, women are three times more likely than men to be widowed at age 65. As such, the article contends, estate planning is something that affects women more than men, and should be a critical component of any women's retirement planning process.

Women earn an average of 24% less than men doing the same jobs according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Seventy-five percent of all elderly Americans living below the poverty level are women. And these women are getting by on Social Security benefits of about $600 -- 25 % lower than the average benefit for a man. On average, women tend to live seven years longer than men according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Let's see if I have this straight: Women live longer, make less, and have a 90% chance of being solely financially responsible for themselves at some point in their lives. Is it true that most women are "one man away from welfare?"

As a woman, you owe it to yourself and your family to make sure you are financially secure. This is not something you can let someone else take care of. Do not assume that your husband, father, or boyfriend has taken care of you. Imagine your shock when he passes away, and you find that you are destitute, or if not destitute, at least in straitened financial circumstances. Imagine your position if he leaves, or divorces you, and you are left to support yourself on your own earnings or your own retirement income alone. Worse yet, would you be responsible for someone else's financial problems?

Baby on Board

baby.jpg "A baby will make love stronger, days shorter, nights longer, bankroll smaller, home happier, clothes shabbier, the past forgotten, and the future worth living for."      ----Author unknown

Congratulations! You're having a baby. It's so exciting, and nerve-wracking, and fun, and OMG how are we going to do this?

You're picking out a crib, wondering which diapers to use, what color should you paint the room. But there is something more important than all of that. You need to make sure your baby will be cared for even if you are not here. Bringing a child into the world means you care for that child, and caring means making sure he or she will be cared for no matter what happens to you.

Did you know that according to the Orphan Society of America, almost three million children are living without parents in the United States? Did you know that 4.1 percent of the children in the United States are parentless?

Suppose a young couple has a three-year-old toddler. Tragically, both parents are killed in a car accident. Their families try to figure out what is best for the child. Imagine the grandparents and aunts and uncles who could be pushing for guardianship of the child. The potential for disagreement is obvious. Without a will where the parents choose a guardian, any family member could create litigation which is costly, detrimental to the child, and puts a strain on family relationships.

The first order of business is to make a will. Maybe you don't have many assets, but you do have something very valuable - your baby. The most important thing you must do in a will is to name guardians. These named individuals are your choice of who will care for and raise your child if you can't. You can even specifically exclude someone from caring for the children.

Sequestration and What it Means to the People of Pennsylvania

Sequestration is a series of automatic, across-the-board cuts to government agencies, totaling $1.2 trillion over 10 years. The cuts are to be split 50-50 between defense and domestic discretionary spending.

It started in 2011 with the standoff over the U.S. debt ceiling. Congress and the administration agreed to more than $2 trillion in spending cuts. About $1 trillion of that was in the debt-ceiling bill, and the rest were imposed through sequestration -- forced cuts that could only be changed by coming up with an equal amount of spending reductions elsewhere.

While cutting spending reduces the deficit, so does raising taxes. Guess what? The administration wants to include tax increases in any deal. Didn't we already do that at the end of the year?

The March 1 effective date for sequestration has come and gone. People you see every day seem none the worse for it. The effects will be delayed assuming no action by Congress, but there will be some consequences.

First, let's look at what the automatic spending cuts affect. There is discretionary spending and non-discretionary spending. Discretionary spending is divided into military and non-military portions. Non-discretionary spending includes medicaid, medicare, social security and debt service. The cuts are almost entirely to be made in discretionary spending.

The cuts are most severe in 2013 and 2014. Then spending is allowed to increase at 2.2 percent per year (the projected inflation rate) after that.

The White House has published papers showing how the cuts affect each state. They are, of course, politically motivated and contain such judgmental words as "threaten," "vital," and "forcing." The groups affected are wide ranging but the "threats" will affect, among others, "children, seniors, people with mental illness and our men and women in uniform."

Who Has to Send 1099s? Do you?

If you are in business, whether self-employed or running a company, you must send a 1099 form (with copies to the IRS) to anyone that you pay money to, unless they meet one or more of the following exceptions:

the recipient is a corporation

you included the payment in a W-2 form (to an employee)

the payment is for a tangible product (office supplies, computers, etc), or

the total payments during the calendar year were less than $600.

To make sure that you are reporting the payment item correctly, you should ask the individual or other payee to fill out a Form W-9, Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification, complete with name, address and social security number or taxpayer identification number. It is recommended that you get the completed W-9 before you make the payment. If you pay someone and they refuse to give you a W-9 or their social security number, you should file the 1099 without the number. The IRS will be in contact with them, and they can explain to the IRS why they won't provide their social security number.

Individuals are not required to send 1099-MISC for personal payments. You are not required to send a 1099-MISC to an independent contractor to whom you made a personal payment unrelated to a trade or business. For example, you don't have to issue a 1099-MISC to your landscaper or house painter.

The IRS started its 1099 information return program in the 1980s. Its purpose is to make it harder for people to work "under the table." The 1099s allow the IRS to run a matching program using social security numbers and tax ID numbers to catch people who receive interest or dividends, receive payment for services, or collect rents but don't report the income.

Most tax practitioners will agree that of all the enforcement programs the IRS has, the 1099 matching program works pretty well.

There are a number of 1099s through which businesses of all kinds report the money they pay, including 1099-INT for interest income, 1099-DIV for dividends and several other 1099 forms to report other specific monetary transactions. 1099-MISCs are used to report free-lance or self-employment income, rental income, prizes and other miscellaneous types of income.

Individual taxpayers are most familiar with a 1099-MISC being used by a trade or business to report payments of $600 or more for services performed by people not treated as employees (such as subcontractors). If you work as an independent contractor, freelancer or consultant, you receive a 1099-MISC reporting what was paid to you from each payor during the calendar year. If you received a 1099, the IRS received a copy of it. Your 1099-MISC income should be reported under schedule C or C-EZ and SE for Self Employment, as part of your regular 1040. Not only do you owe income tax on these earnings, you also owe self employment tax.

 

Emotional Blocks to Estate Planning

death and taxes.jpgDeath and taxes - two subjects that are both emotionally charged. Nobody wants to talk about either one of them - together they are, well, taxing and deadly.

Do you break out in a cold sweat when discussing your will? Can you bear to think about whether there will be enough money to live on if your husband dies? Can you even think about which kid will run the business when Dad dies? Let alone talk about it in a family meeting?

The first hurdle to be overcome is facing your own mortality. Whenever I meet a client I try to wait until they use their own euphemism for death, then I use that expression for the rest of the conference. There's a wide selection of substitutions for the "D" word - "pass on," "kick the bucket," "meet my maker," "when something happens to me," "get hit by a truck," "pushing up daisies," "six feet under" - just to name a few. People will say anything rather than "when I die."

Some folks hold to the superstition that making a will brings on death. Superstitious, yes, but nevertheless, it is a real impediment to many people.

The next hurdle is the fear of giving up control. Estate planning doesn't mean giving your assets away. Many people know they must do something to reduce taxes but fear giving control of assets to children. They have heard too many horror stories about ungrateful children who spend the family savings and turn their backs on their parents. Most people want it both ways - they want to retain complete unfettered control over all their assets and also pay no estate taxes. There are techniques that permit transfers while retaining significant control, and there are ways to protect funds. Learning about these approaches is part of the estate planning process.

Fear of dealing with an attorney is another big hurdle. You might be afraid the lawyer will think you are uninformed, unsophisticated. Do you feel uninformed because you have to call the repairman to fix the air conditioner? Of course not. In the same way that you don't know how to fix an air conditioner, you don't know how to do an estate plan. This is no reflection on your intelligence or character.

You might be afraid of being gouged by fees or be afraid the attorney isn't going to listen to you but just forge ahead with a standard plan you don't want. The key to overcoming these fears is finding the right lawyer. Like anything else, a referral from a satisfied client is often the best approach. Ask your friends who they use for an estate lawyer. Like any other important decision, it is good to do research and talk to a few lawyers or firms before making the hiring decision.

New Tax Law Hits Trusts Hard

higher taxes.jpgMost of the tax increases in the American Tax Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) were aimed at the wealthiest taxpayers. Unfortunately, the tax increases will hit trusts hard.

The Tax Changes

First, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (often called "Obamacare") imposes a 3.8% surtax on net investment income. "Net investment income" generally is the passive investment income earned by a trust or estate.

Second, the top income tax rate went up from 35% to 39.6% and the maximum rate on dividends and capital gains will be 20%, up from 15 % in 2012. (The combined rate will be 23.8%.)

The Collateral Damage

Why are trusts hit so hard? The trust income tax brackets are compressed. For individuals, the Obamacare surtax doesn't hit until a taxpayer has more than $200,000 of income ($250,000 for married filing jointly). For trusts, the surtax hits when income is over $11,950.

For individuals, the top income tax rate of 39.6% doesn't apply until income is over $400,000 ($450,000 for joint). A trust hits the 39.6 % top bracket when trust income is over $11,950.

The 39.6% top bracket plus the 3.8 % surtax, totaling 43.4% is the trust's combined tax on income over $11,950. Ouch, that hurts. $11,950 is not very much income.

Trustees and Executors should pay particular attention to income accumulating in the trust or estate. With the new tax brackets, it will be more important than ever before for trustees and executors to distribute income to beneficiaries so that it can be taxed at beneficiaries' much lower rates rather than being taxed at the trust or estate level.

For capital gains, which do not get passed out to beneficiaries with distributions, trusts and estates will pay 23.8% when income exceeds $11,950. This means that all trusts, including relatively small trusts, will likely have to pay the combined rate of 23.8% on capital gains.

Strategies

For estates and trusts that may be subject to the 3.8% surtax, the time to plan for reducing or eliminating the surtax is now. Strategies for reducing or eliminating the surtax may include: investing in tax exempt bonds, choosing a tax year beginning in 2012 instead of 2013 for estates, making estate or trust distributions to individual beneficiaries who will not be subject to the surtax, and creating above-the-line deductions.

Assets like tax-exempt municipal bonds and life insurance may become more favorable investment options when compared to other investment assets whose income is subject to the surtax. Trustees of trusts with IRA assets, both traditional and Roth IRAs, should consider that these assets will be even more tax-advantaged in 2013 when distributions from these accounts are not subject to the surtax.

Trustees should become familiar with the mechanics of charitable lead trusts and charitable remainder trusts, which may become more popular in light of the income deferral feature of charitable remainder trusts and the ability to shift investment income to charities in charitable lead trusts. Charitable remainder trusts are exempt from the surtax because they are exempt from income tax. Charitable lead trusts will be subject to the surtax, but the surtax may be partially or entirely avoided by the required annual distributions to charities.

 

 

 

 

 

The New Pennsylvania Benefit Corporation

Pennsylvania has a new corporate form called a "Benefit Corporation".

It was signed into law October 24, 2012. Written by Philadelphia lawyers William Clark and Lizzie Babson, the new law has received wide bipartisan support across the country. Pennsylvania is the 12th state to adopt the legislation, joining California, Illinois, New York and other states. The legislation is currently pending in 15 more states. Several high profile companies, including the California apparel company Patagonia, have already become benefit corporations in other states where the legislation has been adopted.

The current legal framework for companies is structured to ensure profit maximization, not social responsibility. In their white paper, "The Need and Rationale for the Benefit Corporation: Why it Is the Legal Form That Best Addresses the Needs of Social Entrepreneurs, Investors, and, Ultimately, the Public," principal authors William H. Clark, Jr. and Larry Vranka state: "As consumer demand for socially responsible products and companies is increasing, consumer trust in corporations is decreasing.

Marketers use the terms 'green,' 'responsible,' 'sustainable,' 'charitable,' and words like them on a daily basis to describe their products or their companies. However, the more these terms are used, the less meaning they have because there are no standards to back up the claims. This problem, often referred to as 'greenwashing,' is misleading for consumers and frustrating for businesses that try to distinguish themselves based on their social and environmental business practices."

Unique Opportunity for Charitable Giving in January 2013

jANUARY 2013.jpgThe American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 ("ATRA") creates a unique opportunity for charitable giving. If a taxpayer acts during January 2013, taxpayers who have attained age 70 1/2 may make a tax-free distribution (commonly referred to as a "charitable rollover") from their IRA to charity of up to $200,000.

In general, distributions from IRAs must be included in gross income in the year in which distribution occurs, and income taxes must be paid on the taxable portion. The advantage here is that a qualified charitable distribution ("QCD"or charitable rollover) is not included in income.

The new tax law reinstates the ability of a 70 1/2 year old individual to make a tax-free IRA distribution or rollover to a charity of up to $100,000 in 2013. The tax law applicable in 2012 did not permit this, it was last available in 2011. The unique opportunity we have now is that during January 2013 (January only), an individual can rollover an additional $100,000 and have it treated as though it were rolled over in 2012. You and your spouse can each make a $100,000 QCD for a total of $200,000 if you file a joint tax return, doubling up for a total of $400,000 in tax-free IRA distributions to charity in 2013.

The donee organization cannot be a non-operating private foundation, a supporting organization or a donor-advised fund, and the individual cannot receive any consideration for the distribution. Distributions from employer-sponsored retirement plans such as SIMPLE IRAs and SEPs do not qualify.

 

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Subscribe to This Blog's Feed Visit Our Probate & Estate Administration Website
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

901 Rohrerstown Road | Lancaster, PA 17601 | Phone: 717.207.7935 | Toll Free: 866.639.5451 | Fax: 717.509.2018 | E-mail | Map & Directions